According to him, the invitation of the former President will determine the next steps to be taken.
“The committee noted that it had conducted extensive investigation into the OPL 245 saga and that it is drawing to a close.
“However the committee is of the view that in the interest of thoroughness, natural justice and fair play, it imperative that evidence should be taken from former President Goodluck Jonathan.
“In arriving at this decision, the committee took account of the following facts: Mr Jonathan was the President at the material time the ministers brokered the so-called resolution agreement that led to the allegation of $1 billion diversion of funds.
“Mr Jonathan’s name features in the proceedings initiated by the Public Prosecutor of Milan in Italy.
“A UK Court judgement in relation to an application to return part of the money being restrained, castigated the Jonathan administration as not having acted in the best interest of Nigeria in relation to the deal.
“The Attorney-General of the Federation at the material time, Mohammed Bello Adoke, who of course has been charged in relation to the case by the EFCC, has recently instituted proceedings in court wherein he pleads that all his actions were as instructed by former President Goodluck Jonathan.
“Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution, the committee has decided to request that former President Goodluck Jonathan give evidence to the committee, as to his role in the matter.
“The secretariat will write to him asking for his response and submissions,” Atunwa said.
While responding to questions, he observed that the former president is at liberty to make a written submission to the committee or otherwise.
He added that his response will determine the next line of action to be taken by the Adhoc committee.
According to Atunwa, that is the cause that is open to him.
“The proper thing is that the committee is taking a decision that he must give evidence.
“Section 89 of the constitution requires that we ask for the evidence; we’ve asked him for evidence and he must give evidence, we have asked him to give his response and submission.
“A matter entirely for him is, he may desire to send us a written submission, and we consider every written submission. We take it one step at a time.
“The normal proceeding for a committee hearing investigating such matter is to take a written submission and whatever comes out of that will have to be decided at the committee level. And then we see the next step, at this time.
“Let’s follow the procedure and the way we’ve been operating. Let’s get this response first, let’s get his written submission first, whatever comes out of that will be decided at the committee level.
“At this time, to discuss will be hypothetical of the modalities of how we take it further, it will not a fruitful use of time, so let’s get his response let’s get his submission if he so wishes and then we take it from there,” Atunwa said.